Comparing Bon Charge vs CurrentBody for an LED face mask? CurrentBody dominates the premium mask market alongside Omnilux, while Bon Charge offers a strong challenger with higher LED count and published irradiance. Here's how they stack up.
Quick verdict: CurrentBody wins on clinical credibility — three wavelengths (including 1072nm deep NIR), FDA 510(k) clearance (K250966), and a 2-year warranty. Bon Charge wins on published power specs — 240 LEDs, ~40.8 mW/cm² irradiance, and zero EMF at a lower price. Buy CurrentBody for clinical pedigree. Buy Bon Charge for value and transparency on specs.
Comparison Table
| Feature | Bon Charge | CurrentBody |
|---|---|---|
| LED Count | 240 | 236 |
| Wavelengths | 630nm + 850nm | 633nm + 830nm + 1072nm |
| Irradiance | ~40.8 mW/cm² | Not consistently published |
| Session Time | 10 min | 10 min (auto shutoff) |
| Material | Flexible silicone | Liquid silicone |
| EMF | 0 mG | Not published |
| FDA 510(k) | Not listed | K250966 |
| Warranty | 1 year | 2 years |
Bon Charge Overview
Bon Charge's Red Light Face Mask uses 240 LEDs emitting 630nm red and 850nm NIR at ~40.8 mW/cm² irradiance (~24.5 J/cm² per 10-minute session). It publishes zero EMF and weighs ~200g. The 630/850nm wavelength pairing aligns with panel-standard photobiomodulation research and a 2025 clinical study on home-use devices.
Shop Bon Charge (Code: SYNCTHERAPY for 10% Off)CurrentBody Mask Overview
CurrentBody Skin LED Mask Series 2 uses 236 LEDs across three wavelengths: 633nm red, 830nm NIR, and 1072nm deep NIR. The third wavelength is unique in this price range. It has FDA 510(k) clearance (K250966) with a stated indication for full-face wrinkles and comes with a 2-year warranty. CurrentBody doesn't consistently publish irradiance on its product page, but emphasizes verified wavelengths and clinical study design.
Key Differences
- LED count: Nearly identical (240 vs 236). Both offer excellent full-face coverage.
- Clinical backing: CurrentBody has FDA 510(k) clearance and adds a third wavelength. Bon Charge does not publish a 510(k) number.
- Design: Both use flexible silicone. CurrentBody calls theirs "liquid silicone" and includes an auto-shutoff feature.
- Price: Bon Charge is typically more affordable. CurrentBody sits at the premium end of the market.
Which Mask Is Better For...
Anti-Aging
CurrentBody's FDA-cleared wrinkle indication and third wavelength give it the clinical edge. Bon Charge publishes higher irradiance for a stronger dose per session.
Sensitive Skin
Both are gentle. CurrentBody's auto-shutoff prevents overuse. Bon Charge's published zero EMF may matter if you're sensitive to electromagnetic fields.
Value
Bon Charge delivers comparable LED count at a lower price with transparent irradiance data. CurrentBody is the premium choice with more regulatory backing.
Final Verdict
Buy Bon Charge for transparent specs, published irradiance, zero EMF, and a lower price. Buy CurrentBody for FDA-cleared wrinkle treatment, three wavelengths, and premium build quality. Both are strong masks — your budget and priorities decide.
Get the Bon Charge Mask (Code: SYNCTHERAPY for 10% Off)Related
FAQ
Is Bon Charge or CurrentBody better for anti-aging?
Both are effective. CurrentBody has FDA 510(k) clearance specifically for wrinkle treatment and adds a third wavelength (1072nm). Bon Charge publishes a clear irradiance figure and has more LEDs at a lower price.
Does CurrentBody have FDA clearance?
Yes. CurrentBody Skin LED Mask Series 2 has FDA 510(k) clearance (K250966) for treatment of full-face wrinkles.
What is CurrentBody's third wavelength?
1072nm deep near-infrared, designed for deeper tissue penetration alongside 633nm red and 830nm NIR.
Affiliate Disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
